For
my Rhetorical analysis I will write about Patrick Clarks American Justice and Divine
Mercy. For me, it was one of the most convincing arguments I read. I read the
paper not having the same thought as his, but left thinking about the same
thing. He understood his audience well, Christians, and referenced many
biblical thoughts and ideas, even scriptures.
From
those scriptural ideas he appealed to the base values people are taught in Sunday
school, basically playing off of ethos. In his paper, he didn’t just reference
the bible to get support though. He stated things the bible taught, and then he
put them together to make a solid defense for his point, (mainly for Christians,
but once again, that was his audience) playing off of Logos. By starting his paper
with “Here are just a couple scattered thoughts that came swirling into my mind
in the wake of Osama bin Laden’s death:” He showed that he was more speaking
from his heart. That made people listen to what he had to say, because it felt
more sincere. That coupled with the emotion of the time and topic, made the
paper a very strong Pathos paper too.
Patrick
Clark’s paper might not have been the longest paper, or maybe the most
convincing to the general audience. Given his audience though, the paper was
very effective in using rhetorical arguments and so was very convincing
I really like the point you made about Clark's first sentence. I hadn't figured out exactly the effect it had on the paper, but I think you hit it right on that it feels more sincere and that he's speaking from his heart. I will also be analyzing this paper, because it really made me think about how I and the country reacted to Osama Bin Laden's death.
ReplyDelete